Use of the SSP-RCP scenario framework in climate impact analysis (part i)


Organizers: Brian O'Neill (University of Denver), Timothy R. Carter (Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE)), Kristie L. Ebi (University of Washington)

research SESSION

TUESDAY - Maglione Hall (Sie Complex Fifth Floor)

4:45 PM-4:50 PM
Introduction to the session
Organizers

4:50 PM-5:05 PM
Climate impact assessments for the agricultural sector across scales and disciplines
Hermann Lotze-Campen, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)

5:05 PM-5:20 PM
Integrating income growth and climate change scenarios to assess the effects on global nutrition security to mid-century
Gerald Nelson, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

5:20 PM-5:35 PM
Using climate indicators and scenario uncertainties to target climate hotspot risk reduction
Keywan Riahi, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis

5:35 PM-5:50 PM
Projections of human exposure to deadly heat in African cities under multiple socioeconomic and climate scenarios
Guillaume Rohat, University of Geneva and National Center for Atmospheric Research

5:50 PM-6:05 PM
A co-design approach for climate change management thresholds, triggers, and signals
Nicholas Cradock-Henry, Manaaki Whenua-Landcare Research

6:05 PM-6:30 PM
Discussion

Future climate and societal conditions will change climate-related hazards, exposures, and vulnerabilities, thereby affecting the level of ambition needed to prepare for and manage climate change risks. Therefore, scenarios of climate and societal change play a key role in projecting risks, and the scenario framework provided by the Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) and Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) is increasingly being adopted for this purpose. This session welcomes submissions that apply the SSP-RCP framework to risk and impact analyses, evaluate it for its suitability for such analyses, or both. Applications at scales from the local to global, and for any sector (or multiple sectors) are appropriate. Methodological analyses of interest include those that demonstrate how the SSP-RCP framework facilitated and/or enhanced impact analyses, challenges or limitations of using the framework, and needed future directions of the framework to improve projections.   

Of particular interest are submissions using or testing the framework for its originally anticipated uses, including (but not limited to): evaluating impacts avoided at lower (compared to higher) levels of climate change and/or of adaptation, identifying the role of land use in the consistency between SSP-RCP combinations, and examining the sensitivity of vulnerabilities, exposure, impacts, or adaptation to alternative societal or climate conditions. Analyses either of climate system or human dimensions are appropriate; interdisciplinary analyses involving combinations of the climate system, biophysical impacts and societal aspects are especially relevant.